HIKERS VS. BIKERS ON ENERGY CORRIDOR TRAILS
 |
New warning signs on Terry Hershey Trail
telling bicyclists to mind the pedestrians |
The West Houston trails are mostly, if not universally, multi-use trails.
They are also getting extremely popular, especially on weekends; especially with
nice weather, in other words all your round except at the heights of heat in
the summer, and on a the few days cold days of winter, and the occasional
rains. On gorgeous days as we are having them now, the parking lots alongside
Highway 6 (at Briar Forest and at the point where Buffalo Bayou emerges from the reservoir through the flow-control gate) are not only filled to capacity; they are
overflowing, with cars and trucks ending up on the grass and on unmarked
portions of pavement. But the scarcity of parking space is not the only
problem. The nonmotorized moving traffic is getting to be a problem too.
Park users on bikes vs those on foot
The multi-use trail design approach has its problems. To be more specific,
it is the collision of the interest of the cyclists and the hikers and walkers,
if not literally: collision that is, of hiker and biker. There is a posted speed limit of 10 MPH when
passing pedestrians on the paved trails, but it gets routinely ignored. Some
biker approaching from behind shout to announce their impending approach, as
they are supposed to, but not all do. Only a few bicycles have hand bells.
Nor is it clear how the speed limit or the park-etiquette rules could it be
enforced, except after the fact, in a court of law perhaps, when it comes to
determining liability for damages caused in a collision. Which is bound to
happen. More should be done to prevent the harm before it occurs. More should
be done in the way of prevention.
Incompatible interests
Many cyclists are, or aspire to be, serious about their pursuit. They
practice cycling as a sport. They go fast, and the 10 MPH speed limit does not
suit them.
Dedicated bike and pedestrian paths, respectively, or territorial dominance
by threat of speed?
Some segments of trail are already pretty much the preserve of the
cyclists, such as the segments that run alongside Barker Dam on the foot of the
outside slope from J.R. Hatch Park to the flow control gate at Highway 6 and continuing
on heading South to Noble Road at Briar Forest.
Dam pedestrians have their own option: walk at their leisure the gravel
road on top of Barker Dam, and enjoy the view: On one side the natural
wilderness inside the reservoir; on the other, at the turn of the head, the
panorama of what passes for the Energy Corridor's skyline.
To the North,
Diamond Offshore, the old and new Energy Crossing buildings, the TopGolf net,
and the Wyndham Hotel beyond the SH6-Katy Freeway overpass. To the East: the buildings
that make up the BP Campus in all their multi-chromatic beauty and the Eldridge
Place Office Towers. Cyclists can take to the top, too, but it will take a dirt
bike or mountain bike, and the maximum speed will be capped by the rough
condition of the dam road surface. The same goes for Addicks Road Dam.
But the bike-vs-pedestrian situation on the Terry Hershey Park trails
alongside Buffalo Bayou and the Memorial Loop Segment on both sides of Langham
Creek above the confluence point is another matter. There is competition for
foot and elbow room space there, and greater caution is paramount, pending a
better physical trail plan design or viable nonmotorized traffic solution of
regulatory nature.
A Bottleneck: The Bayou Bridge in George Bush Park
Another problem area is the boardwalk across Buffalo Bayou on the Southern
side. It's a great spot to watch the turtles sunning themselves on an old log
in the water below, but the pedestrian bridge is fairly narrow, with railings left and right,
which leave no room to take evasive action when a cyclist approaches at high
speed from the West or from the East, not to mention different bikers coming for directions at the same time. At the same time, the bridge/boardwalk is a great place for families with kids to
watch turtles, and may be oblivious of the danger of turning around and moving
as little as a foot to one side.

That segment of the Bush Park trail is a veritable bottleneck and a
predictable accident site. Horses are banned from the boardwalk, but cyclists
are not; nor are they required to dismount. The only hint of a concern of the
inherent risks of having pedestrians and bikes share a long narrow stretch of
boardwalk are the 10 mile speed limits signs on both ends.
The new warning
signs posted along the trails in that area only advise of the dangers of wildlife,
not of speeding bicyclists.
Nor is it realistic to expect that the County or U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers will build a second bridge any time soon so that pedestrians and
cyclists can be separated and cross safely at a distance to each other.
Can we all get along alongside?
Given the absence of alternatives to deal with the bottleneck, perhaps
cyclists should be required to get off their bikes and push them across the
ped-bike bridge, at least on weekends. It might even facilitate friendly communication
between the two groups of park and nature aficionados whose interest otherwise collide,
and whose ways of pursuing their respective recreational preferences don't
otherwise lend themselves to trail talk, if any contact of the conversational
kind. After all, at their typical respective speeds, the encounter of hiker and
biker along the trail lasts but a moment, unless it results in a collision,
which is the type of encounter to be avoided, not facilitated. Perhaps it is
time to have a conversation. A conversation about safety for both hiker and
biker.